|
Post by hydroshock on Oct 15, 2009 19:03:40 GMT -6
Man I hope so, I'd like to see more of the Battle Red.....BUT......let's lose the red pants this time and go back to the Red/White. Personally I've always thought that was a better look.
|
|
|
Post by mrcommissioner on Oct 16, 2009 8:40:35 GMT -6
Man I hope so, I'd like to see more of the Battle Red.....BUT......let's lose the red pants this time and go back to the Red/White. Personally I've always thought that was a better look. I agree that the red jersey/white pants combo looks better. I don't mind them using all red either though as long as it's not every time, just to change it up a bit. Maybe once every 3 seasons or something. I really like the all blue/red numbers look. I think that's my fave of all.
|
|
|
Post by thegoat on Oct 16, 2009 8:45:12 GMT -6
I wouldnt mind a red jersey with like black pants. That would look kinda cool.
|
|
|
Post by mrcommissioner on Oct 16, 2009 8:51:46 GMT -6
Did yall see the ticket packages on the splash page? Are we having a total of 4 Battle Red games counting the one against Jax from week 2? From what I understand, each team has the opportunity to use alternate jerseys 2 times per year. I'm not sure if there is a rule concerning pants, which is why we had at least one game I remember last year (Clots) in all blue. Personally, I think if they did decide to do it 4 times a year, it would take away from what it is. I'm against it. I like it to mean something. After all, how special is it if they do it so much? If Christmas was every day except one... it would get boring really fast, then it would lose meaning. And then everyone will look forward to the one day it isn't Christmas. I think we should use Battle red vs Jags and Tacks and all blue vs Clots. Everyone else gets the reg unis... maybe do something special if we play the Cowgirls here (once every 3-6 seasons)... that would be cool too.
|
|
|
Post by ab on Oct 16, 2009 10:42:35 GMT -6
Agreed^^
|
|
|
Post by hydroshock on Oct 16, 2009 17:10:46 GMT -6
I love the all blues, I wish they'd switch to that as one of our standard unis because it looks tough as nails. The all reds are great as a novelty but we've rolled with those on every Battle Red game since the Broncos thursday nighter....its definitely time to change back. btw, Christmas is just a commercial money making scam for anyone over 12........sorry if that ruins it for anyone.
|
|
|
Post by mrcommissioner on Oct 17, 2009 8:48:13 GMT -6
btw, Christmas is just a commercial money making scam for anyone over 12........sorry if that ruins it for anyone. i agree. too bad we can't be kids forever.
|
|
|
Post by SMC-22 on Oct 17, 2009 9:54:19 GMT -6
red jerseys,blue pants...now thats Texan.
|
|
|
Post by hydroshock on Oct 27, 2009 22:11:34 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by mrcommissioner on Oct 27, 2009 23:00:06 GMT -6
lol @ live chat
McClain's isn't much better.
It seems someone screening questions has a sense of humor or is just as ignorant as the ones submitting them.
|
|
|
Post by thegoat on Oct 28, 2009 5:09:42 GMT -6
hey I got one question in there!
|
|
|
Post by hydroshock on Oct 28, 2009 12:35:52 GMT -6
hey I got one question in there! lemme guess....this one right?? Baron Schultz - Arlington,my home is Katy, TX, US: Why does Kyle Shanahan not run with Vonta Leach, with a huge back like that and someone who seems to have good hands when he catches the ball, it seems like in those short yardage and goal line situations they could power him through there. So why do they not run Vonta Leach in short yardage and goal line situations? Nick Scurfield (1:26:03 PM): Leach only has a few carries in his entire career. The Texans prefer to use him as a punishing lead blocker and receiver out of the backfield. I seem to get questions about him every week, though, so I'll try to ask one of the coaches this week so that you're not just hearing it from me.
|
|
|
Post by thegoat on Oct 28, 2009 17:17:17 GMT -6
oh I wasnt at the Nick Scurfield chat, I thought he was talking about the McClain chat.
|
|
|
Post by mrcommissioner on Oct 28, 2009 22:49:49 GMT -6
no goat I was refering to the Scurfield chat.
Your question was good and McClain just gave you a vague answer which just pointed out the obvious.
|
|
|
Post by hydroshock on Nov 3, 2009 13:58:15 GMT -6
See....these are the type of questions I'm talking about that just make Texans fans look stupid. I mean, c'mon!
|
|
|
Post by SMC-22 on Nov 3, 2009 14:09:08 GMT -6
WOW HE SAID GO HAPPEN
|
|
|
Post by mrcommissioner on Nov 3, 2009 15:13:14 GMT -6
PEOPLE THAT TYPE IN ALL CAPS GENERALLY GIVE THEMSELVES UP AS BEING RETARDS FROM THE GET GO.
oops.
|
|
|
Post by thegoat on Nov 3, 2009 16:30:52 GMT -6
or the people that ask the same question over and over again. I mean how many times do you have to ask who is going to replace Owen Daniels? Did the first 10 times not get through to you?
|
|
|
Post by ab on Nov 10, 2009 11:09:25 GMT -6
In a presser with Kubiak yesterday he said that we will be taking a "look" at Larry Johnson. doesnt seem like our type of player attitude wise but has been a solid RB in the past. TBH if I was on KC all that time I'd be a little disgruntled too. Thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by ab on Nov 10, 2009 11:18:07 GMT -6
Nevermind. didnt see the thread on this.
|
|